Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:59:24 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Greg Maxwell wrote:

addresses, so when one path goes down, it will use another. (SCTP is
useless as a TCP replacement, though.) And there have been successful

I've been being good about keeping my multi6 advocacy off of nanog, but I
have to correct here:  SCTP can be used as a full replacement of TCP as it
is a strict superset, it also can replace UDP for many applications.

That is like replacing passenger trains by freight trains. After all,
aren't passengers just one type of freight?

SCTP has a whole bunch of features that are of no use to our current
applications, that all expect TCP. It would be very unwise to switch to a
new transport protocol just because it has one desirable feature that can
very easily be built in TCP.

Two modules that do 99% the same thing but with different code is bad
software design. And SCTP is not backwards compatible with older TCP
implementations or access filters or firewalls or anything.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]