mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:59:24 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Greg Maxwell wrote:
addresses, so when one path goes down, it will use another. (SCTP is
useless as a TCP replacement, though.) And there have been successful
I've been being good about keeping my multi6 advocacy off of nanog, but I
have to correct here: SCTP can be used as a full replacement of TCP as it
is a strict superset, it also can replace UDP for many applications.
That is like replacing passenger trains by freight trains. After all,
aren't passengers just one type of freight?
SCTP has a whole bunch of features that are of no use to our current
applications, that all expect TCP. It would be very unwise to switch to a
new transport protocol just because it has one desirable feature that can
very easily be built in TCP.
Two modules that do 99% the same thing but with different code is bad
software design. And SCTP is not backwards compatible with older TCP
implementations or access filters or firewalls or anything.
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)