mailing list archives
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Bob K <melange () yip org>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:29:38 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Doug Clements wrote:
A business that requires direct Internet access can't use NAT at the border.
Not true. While I expect you will take this as nitpicking, one:one NAT is
very conveniently used for servers while one:many NAT can be used for
generic workstation access while preserving a consistent LAN numbering
scheme. Anything that a "full" internet connection gets you will also work
with one:one NAT.
...except current implementations of IPSEC:
Luckily, the above article also mentions the fixes that are in the
Bob <melange () yip org> | Yes. I know. That is, indeed, *not* mayonnaise.