Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:55:16 -0700


|> From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork () inch com]
|> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:16 PM

|> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:

|> > To be honest, even though I've used NAT myself and have 
|> implemented NAT for
|> > friends and clients, I would NEVER represent that a NAT'd 
|> address has the
|> > full connectivity to the Internet that a static address does.
|> 
|> True...  neither does a well-firewalled LAN.

There is a substantial difference between broken access and controlled
access.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]