mailing list archives
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Bob K <melange () yip org>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:06:41 -0400 (EDT)
...except current implementations of IPSEC:
Luckily, the above article also mentions the fixes that are in the
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Bora Akyol wrote:
I am not supporting NAT here, but
most common IPSEC implementations including Free S/WAN work fine behind
I stand corrected after perusing http://jixen.tripod.com/#NATed%20gateways
- although I'm not sure I'd describe that as working "fine", but rather
"can be made to work, in a narrow set of circumstances". It should be
noted that the Free S/WAN docs explicitly recommend against trying it.
Bob <melange () yip org> | Yes. I know. That is, indeed, *not* mayonnaise.
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Bob K (Sep 07)
RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 07)