Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:52:30 -0700

On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 02:02:57PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu pontificated:
That's like saying "You're only allowed to direct-dial your phone if
you know how many volts are between the red and green wires, and what
it's there for - everybody else has to ask the operator for assistance".

Cross out "operator" and put in "NAT", and that's your proposal.....

fortunately, we don't need a hyoomun to translate every packet - if we had
s/operator/automated non-human directory assistance/ I'd go along with your
allegory. :)

                              Valdis Kletnieks
                              Operating Systems Analyst
                              Virginia Tech

Scott Francis                   darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager          sfrancis@ [work:]         t o n o s . c o m
UNIX | IP networks | security | sysadmin | caffeine | BOFH | general geekery
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7              illum oportet crescere me autem minui

Attachment: _bin

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]