mailing list archives
Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:52:30 -0700
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 02:02:57PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu pontificated:
That's like saying "You're only allowed to direct-dial your phone if
you know how many volts are between the red and green wires, and what
it's there for - everybody else has to ask the operator for assistance".
Cross out "operator" and put in "NAT", and that's your proposal.....
fortunately, we don't need a hyoomun to translate every packet - if we had
s/operator/automated non-human directory assistance/ I'd go along with your
Operating Systems Analyst
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
UNIX | IP networks | security | sysadmin | caffeine | BOFH | general geekery
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere me autem minui