Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verio Peering Question
From: "Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch () darkwing uoregon edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:40:50 -0700 (PDT)

try a little harder -


Lucy E. Lynch                           Academic User Services
Computing Center                        University of Oregon
llynch () darkwing uoregon edu          (541) 346-1774
Cell: (541) 912-7998                    5419127998 () mobile att net

On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

At 04:31 PM 9/27/2001 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
 >> I don't think anyone has ever claimed (Randy included)
 >> that filtering out long prefixes never hurts performance /to
 >> those long prefixes/. Just that the usage of those long
 >> prefixes is small, the effect is often small, and the NET
 >> effect (i.e. on performance to all prefixes) is often improved,
 >> AND the 'public good' effect, in terms of encouraging
 >> CIDR and discouraging disaggregation has benefits for
 >> the global routing table, for everybody, in terms of
 >> reduction of cost (nice statistical demonstration at
 >> last IETF Ptomaine session - please refer to 'belling
 >> the cat' problem).
 >> Are you going to present statistical data to the contrary?

Not Found
The requested URL /~rand/010809.ptomaine.pdf was not found on this server.

Sorry. :(



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]