Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Gorgon's Knot. Was: Re: Verio Peering Question
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:10:18 -0400


At 12:51 PM 9/28/2001 -0700, Paul Vixie wrote:

>If it's a good idea and well presented, they'll do it.

Dorian argued (effectively, IMHO) that this is no where near always the case.


>But somebody like Patrick would qualify as a third party, with no rights at
>all, and would be, and should be, ignored.

Thanx, Paul.  I do believe you qualify as a third party as well. :)

However, please note that at no time did I say Verio must stop filtering. At least I do not think I did. If I did, please forgive me, I should not have done so. In fact, I quite clearly stated: "I encourage Verio and Verio engineers to continue filtering if they so desire."

I did say their actions were opposite their words (they are), I mentioned that no other backbone (at least none I can find) filters like Verio does, and I noted some of the affects to smaller providers if all backbones filtered.


I also encouraged all other backbones to filter Verio as Verio filters them. But that is just a suggestion. Feel free to configure your routers (mail servers, etc.) as you please.

--
TTFN,
patrick


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]