Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...)From: steve uurtamo <uurtamo () arttoday com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:37:34 -0700
And can I persuade the judge that since NATs are known to
muck about w/ addresses & such that I can construct a case
that what was received did not come from me. So the porn
came from one of the NAT operators.
similarly, the anonymous remail operator sends all outbound mail, eh?