Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...)
From: steve uurtamo <uurtamo () arttoday com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:37:34 -0700

      And can I persuade the judge that since NATs are known to
      muck about w/ addresses & such that I can construct a case
      that what was received did not come from me. So the porn
      came from one of the NAT operators.

similarly, the anonymous remail operator sends all outbound mail, eh?
i dunno.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]