mailing list archives
Re: Re: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:28:10 -0400
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said:
Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at
hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer
to most of the questions.
Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG?
A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use.
Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance,
should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers?
A2: See Q1.
Operating Systems Analyst
RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... Roeland Meyer (Sep 10)
RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ... woody weaver (Sep 12)