Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Totally OT, sorry; was (Re: Lack of Security)
From: Christian Kuhtz <christian () kuhtz com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:56:59 -0400

Leo Bicknell wrote:
The problem I have with all of the FAA action is that anyone with
a valid rating can rent a plane, even planes this large if they
have enough money.  I would guess the hijackers wanted a plane full
of people for additional shock value, but obtaining an empty (but
full of fuel) plane would be even easier for them, and almost no
FAA security measures would stop them.  Additionally, on a private
plane they could load on it explosive cargo without too much effort,
adding even more punch to the process.

Buying a set of tickets is considerably cheaper than leasing the entire plane
just for yourself and paying for the fuel load.  Why bother loading
explosives, seems this did the job for them with a nearly fully fueled plane.

Get over the inconveniences.  They appear to have curbed terrorism effectively
in other parts of the world.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]