mailing list archives
Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone?
From: Christopher McCrory <chrismcc () pricegrabber com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:29:13 -0700
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:32, Rick Ernst wrote:
We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac
OC-3. One of the responses came back with "we won't be competive with
<provider> because they don't have their own backbone.
Is there a cross-reference for provider vs network backbone, or is this just
something that we have to ask each provider for? I "assume" that UU, Sprint,
and AT&T are self-owned backbones, but others... ?
One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any comments good/bad on
I use Level-3 out of the LA Equinix facility. From a content provider
point of view, they rule. I have never had a problem with them, solid
as a rock.
reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and AT&T. I also realize
that the "they suck less" list changes continuously... :)
I hope more people respond to this part "for future reference".
"The guy that keeps the servers running"
chrismcc () pricegrabber com
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works.