mailing list archives
Re: Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:15:27 +0000 (GMT)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 alex () yuriev com wrote:
Neither is really an 'order' so much as a 'suggestion'.. either way, its
kind of inappropriate to make this suggestion without knowing how each
operator can or could apply a fix... that is my opinion atleast.
The thing is - DHS told us so is the new favourite excuse for operators to
refuse to fix anything that is/or could be broken.
Over last two weeks I have heard the "We have implemented the DHS order" as
the excuse from
-- snip excuses --
Of course, the moment one hears the "DHS told us" line, nothing else can be
perhaps a change in vendors is in order? I can't see why people would lie
about this, or why they'd listen to the 'request' from DHS in the first
place ;( Oh well.
Re: Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?) Paul Vixie (Aug 28)