Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:15:27 +0000 (GMT)



On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 alex () yuriev com wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/li0s

Neither is really an 'order' so much as a 'suggestion'.. either way, its
kind of inappropriate to make this suggestion without knowing how each
operator can or could apply a fix... that is my opinion atleast.

The thing is - DHS told us so is the new favourite excuse for operators to
refuse to fix anything that is/or could be broken.

Over last two weeks I have heard the "We have implemented the DHS order" as
the excuse from

-- snip excuses --


Of course, the moment one hears the "DHS told us" line, nothing else can be
done.


perhaps a change in vendors is in order? I can't see why people would lie
about this, or why they'd listen to the 'request' from DHS in the first
place ;( Oh well.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault