Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Network Solutions and Broken E-mail Addresses
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ab ca>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 21:29:00 -0600

--On Friday, August 8, 2003 5:56 PM -0700 "Jeremy T. Bouse" <Jeremy.Bouse () UnderGrid net> wrote:

        Unfortunately I'd have to say NetSol is not alone on this as a
vast majority of the sites I've had to enter an email address will not
accept a user+detail () domain format... I find it to be quite annoying
that I can use the format as it helps with filtering of email and is
completely valid according to the current RFCs wrt mail.

John Klensin has an internet-draft out that addresses this issue. See section 3 of draft-klensin-name-filters-02.txt. I don't know if this will be any more useful than RFC 2822 when it comes to bashing the clueless over the head, but every bit helps, I guess.

I find that when I complain about this sort of thing I have about a 20% success rate in getting the problem fixed. Something I've found to be helpful is to offer the site an ERE I wrote that does (mostly correct) validation of RFC 2822 addresses. If the site is running UNIX they'll usually incorporate the ERE into their validation software.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]