mailing list archives
Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
From: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall () ihug co nz>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:15:44 +1200 (NZST)
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
This is the first trade publication I've seen that's covered some
of the issues with ISPs blocking or not blocking ports.
Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
Long term problems can be caused by port blocking
by Paul Brislen and James Niccolai, Auckland and San Francisco
"While some end users are calling for ISPs to block certain ports relating
to the Microsoft exploit as reported yesterday (Feared RPC worm starts to
spread), most ISPs are reluctant to do so."
Just a note that my manager Anand Lal is quoted in the article, he's said
that the quotes attributed to him are not correct.
We have put some port 135 blocks in however, probably only for a short
amount of time.
I've been looking at out traffic graphs and trying to decide if traffic
really is down 10-15% over the last 24 hours or it's just my imagination.
Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: simon.lyall () ihug co nz
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: simon () darkmere gen nz
Ihug Ltd, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Simon Lyall (Aug 12)
RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus McBurnett, Jim (Aug 12)
RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Matthew Kaufman (Aug 13)
RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Mark Segal (Aug 12)
RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus McBurnett, Jim (Aug 13)