Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
From: "Temkin, David" <temkin () sig com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:15:42 -0400


True, but at that time you didn't have illegitimate traffic on port 80,
either.  Future engineering could be worked around this issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matthew () eeph com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:09 PM
To: 'McBurnett, Jim'; nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus




From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On
Behalf Of McBurnett, Jim
...  I really can not image 
legitimate traffic on 135..

My problem with this approach is that, in 1985, you could have said "I
really cannot imagine legitimate traffic on port 80".

(On the other hand, you could probably say that today and be mostly right)

Matthew Kaufman
matthew () eeph com


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]