Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Blocking port 135?
From: Richard Irving <rirving () onecall net>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:57:54 -0500

So, you don't like the smell of fried chicken ?

  We keep an old overclocked 486-33, with a quadrupler
around, making it run at about 100mhz..  for just this purpose...

  Complete the Chicken ritual, at Midnight, of course.

 Unprotect port 25, let alt.freak know...

   Route all mail to /dev/null....

   Whip the chicken on to the old processor,
and wait till the spam hits....

  Fried chicken in 5 minutes or less.



Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:

In reality blocking port 135 is almost never sufficient.  Its slightly
better than waving a dead chicken over your PC.

its far less stinky than the chicken option though, you must admit that.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]