Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Blocking port 135?
From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:25:35 -0400

Im pretty sure the Shavlik products require the RPC ports for people to use
HFNETCHK LE and stuff like that, and a lot of our co-lo customers use that
to keep their win boxes up to date, which I think is great because that's
one less abuse email I have to reply to ;-)


-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates () brightok net] 
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:32 PM
To: Sean Donelan
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Blocking port 135?

Sean Donelan wrote:
free/cheap software firewalls that
are easy and effective to use.  

And breaks all kinds of nifty things which ISP has to pay for via 
helpdesk support.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]