mailing list archives
RE: Blocking port 135?
From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:25:35 -0400
Im pretty sure the Shavlik products require the RPC ports for people to use
HFNETCHK LE and stuff like that, and a lot of our co-lo customers use that
to keep their win boxes up to date, which I think is great because that's
one less abuse email I have to reply to ;-)
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates () brightok net]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:32 PM
To: Sean Donelan
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Blocking port 135?
Sean Donelan wrote:
free/cheap software firewalls that
are easy and effective to use.
And breaks all kinds of nifty things which ISP has to pay for via
- Re: Blocking port 135?, (continued)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Drew Weaver (Aug 02)
- RE: Blocking port 135? Michel Py (Aug 02)