Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Blocking port 135?
From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:25:35 -0400


Im pretty sure the Shavlik products require the RPC ports for people to use
HFNETCHK LE and stuff like that, and a lot of our co-lo customers use that
to keep their win boxes up to date, which I think is great because that's
one less abuse email I have to reply to ;-)

-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates () brightok net] 
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:32 PM
To: Sean Donelan
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Blocking port 135?


Sean Donelan wrote:
free/cheap software firewalls that
are easy and effective to use.  

And breaks all kinds of nifty things which ISP has to pay for via 
helpdesk support.


-Jack


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]