Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: VoIP QOS best practices
From: "Charles Youse" <cyouse () register com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:23:44 -0500


Indeed, but in this case I'm dealing with a private network that doesn't
have so much surplus as to guarantee no contention.

C.

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Charles Youse
Cc: Bill Woodcock; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: VoIP QOS best practices 


On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:02:39 EST, Charles Youse <cyouse () register com>
said:
That doesn't seem to make a lot of sense - is it that QoS doesn't work
as advertised?

Qos is designed for dealing with "who gets preference when there's a
bandwidth
shortage".  Most places are having a bandwidth glut at the moment, so
the VoIP
traffic gets through just fine and QoS isn't able to provide much
measurable
improvement.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault