Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:49:05 -0800 (PST)

The outcome of the discussions at the Address Policy SIG will be posted
to this list.

where, one hopes, discussion will continue, yes?


        why would an APNIC/AP region specific issue need to be discussed
        on the NANOG list and not the RIPE/AFNOG/et.al. regional ops lists?
        This is a prefix delegated to the APregion and so they should be
        the ones who set the policies for the prefixes they are responsible
        for. I appreciate their willingness to share the outcome of their
        deliberations, but why NAites have any special say in AP policies
        is a bit beyond me.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]