mailing list archives
RE: Remote email access
From: "Al Rowland" <alan_r1 () corp earthlink net>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:20:50 -0800
Don't even need that. I can telnet into the appropriate server/port from
a command prompt but, like your solution below, that is not non-geek
friendly. We need a solution that is AOL user friendly, not NANOG user
friendly if we ever expect to make money with this thing called the
Internet. This will always be tragedy-of-the-commons; the very things
that make service attractive for Joe PayingCustomer also make it easy
for Joe Spammer/Hax0r.
Open<->Secure, choose your business plan carefully. Good Luck.
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On
Behalf Of David Lesher
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:06 AM
To: nanog list
Subject: Re: Remote email access
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Al Rowland said:
Only convenient kludge that is (mostly) provider independent is a
webmail service, a completely different can of worms/flame war.
Or a shell account at Panix, reached via SSH.
$100.00/year is worth it to me; YMMV.
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301)
56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't
close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or
Re: Remote email access Daniel Senie (Feb 04)
RE: Remote email access Al Rowland (Feb 04)
Re: Remote email access John R. Levine (Feb 04)
Re: Remote email access John R Levine (Feb 04)
Re: Remote email access Michael . Dillon (Feb 05)