Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: anti-spam vs network abuse
From: "David G. Andersen" <dga () lcs mit edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:15:16 -0500


On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:11:00PM -0600, Jack Bates quacked:

Should we outlaw a potentially beneficial practice due to its abuse by
criminals?

Okay. What happens if you make a mistake and overload one of my devices
costing my company money. I guarantee you, the law will look favorably on
damages. That is the problem with probing. Sometimes the probe itself can be
the damage. Programmers are human. Humans make mistakes. Programmers are
perfect.

That wasn't the question.  There are plenty of circumstances in
which it's legal to do something once  -- say, make a phone
call to you and ask how you're doing -- and illegal to do it
one hundred million times.  You don't outlaw telephones because
people can and have used them to harass other people, you outlaw
the harassing behavior and make it subject to damages. ... which
is exactly what you described.

Probing can be knocking on your door, or it can be taking a sledgehammer
to your garage.  These are so quantitatively different that there
is a qualitative shift between the behaviors.

  -Dave

-- 
work: dga () lcs mit edu                          me:  dga () pobox com
      MIT Laboratory for Computer Science           http://www.angio.net/
      I do not accept unsolicited commercial email.  Do not spam me.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]