mailing list archives
Re: NAT for an ISP
From: "David G. Andersen" <dga () lcs mit edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:08:00 -0400
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:51:51PM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff quacked:
I would like to know if any service providers have built their access
networks out using private IP space. It certainly would benefit the
global IP pool but it may adversely affect users with special
applications. At any rate, it sounds like good fodder for a debate.
I've got a friend who puts all of his internal servers,
routers, and _customers_ on RFC1918 space and pipes them out
thrugh a PNAT. Fairly small ISP - maybe 15 megabits of bandwidth -
operating at the state local level.
It's an interesting setup. Kind of fun. The stateful pnat
functionality forces customers to specify exactly what inbound
services they want, which can't hurt security. Every customer
gets a /24 or greater, which helps convenience. On the other
hand, everyone has a NAT in front of them, which means that
they get clients who would have probably been putting a NAT
in front of themselves anyway. I probably wouldn't use that
setup myself, but then again, I subscribe to nanog...
work: dga () lcs mit edu me: dga () pobox com
MIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/
I do not accept unsolicited commercial email. Do not spam me.
Re: NAT for an ISP David G. Andersen (Jun 04)
Re: NAT for an ISP Johannes Catterwell (Jun 04)
RE: NAT for an ISP William S. Duncanson (Jun 04)
Re: NAT for an ISP Mans Nilsson (Jun 05)