Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 03:37:01 +0000 (GMT)

SS> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:22:38 -0500
SS> From: Stephen Sprunk

SS> When a 30Mpps IPv4 box falls back to <200kpps for IPv6, I
SS> don't think "not completely functional" is an adequate
SS> description.  To me, that falls into the "not supported"
SS> category.

Okay, I'll make a fool of myself on-list -- certainly not the
first time. ;-)

Why not use the highest-order 32 bits of an IPv6 address for
interdomain routing... i.e., "overlay" them on IPv4 addresses
and/or a 32-bit ASN?  Yes, it smells of classful routing.  Call
me shortsighted, but how many billion interdomain routing
policies do we really need?

Probably OT, but seems semi-fitting for the thread.

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]