Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 05:00:44 +0000 (GMT)

SS> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:48:18 -0500
SS> From: Stephen Sprunk

SS> Most L3 switches shipping today (e.g. the product in question) have
SS> particular ethertypes and destination address offsets hardcoded into their
SS> ASICs.  It's not a matter of supporting 128-bit addresses -- they simply
SS> doesn't understand IPv6's header any more than they do DECnet or AppleTalk.


SS> While allocation policies may have an effect on how IPv6 FIBs are most
SS> efficiently stored, address length is a fairly small part of the problem

...but there's no sense making the tries more unwieldy than they
need to be.

SS> when you're talking about redesigning every ASIC to handle both IPv4 and
SS> IPv6.

Less redesign required if reusing the existing IPv4 lookup.

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]