Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks
From: Richard Irving <rirving () onecall net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:19:40 -0500


IMHO:

 No more, or less, than SMTP.

 It is -that- simple.

(Of course, SMTP is how China got
  Nuclear Secrets out of America :( )

FWIW: This is more tempestuous reactions at High Levels,
that would normally have been laughed off.....

Except P2P's are annoying the Recording Industry execs,
 and they have $$$ on the line, so.....

 $$$ has a way a bringing things to light that would
otherwise simply have been ignored....

 But, for this to make it to the NS Risk Assessment groups just
demonstrates the licentious influence between the Current
Administration Policies and "Money Men".

 After all, how many meetings are there going to
be assessing the risk SMTP has on National Security ?

 Or, as you mentioned, MS file sharing...

 And, remember, SMTP is -already- proven guilty of said Risk,
and a far more -probable- culprit in future compromises... !

Reality Check.

My .02c

.Richard.

  My, what interesting times we live in,
     and darn it, important people noticed me! :{

Sean Donelan wrote:

June 10, 2003

NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED FULL COMMITTEE HEARING
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary scheduled for Wednesday, June 11,
2003, at 2:00 p.m., on .The Dark Side of a Bright Idea: Could Personal
and National Security Risks Compromise the Potential of P2P File-Sharing
Networks?. has been rescheduled for Tuesday, June 17, 2003 at 2:00 p.m.
in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Building.

By order of the Chairman





I wonder if anyone is going to mention that Microsoft Network Neighborhood
file sharing is a form of P2P file sharing.



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]