Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:10:57 +0100 (BST)

Hmm where do you draw the line.. peer2peer file sharing, MS Networking, SMTP, 
telephones, snail mail, visiting foreign countries, meeting people at all.. ?

Seems a bit silly to me to be having the conversation at all, its people who 
willingly leak this information not the mechanism used thats at fault


On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Richard Irving wrote:

  After all, how many meetings are there going to
be assessing the risk SMTP has on National Security ?

  Or, as you mentioned, MS file sharing...

  And, remember, SMTP is -already- proven guilty of said Risk,
and a far more -probable- culprit in future compromises... !

Reality Check.

My .02c


   My, what interesting times we live in,
      and darn it, important people noticed me! :{

Sean Donelan wrote:

June 10, 2003

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary scheduled for Wednesday, June 11,
2003, at 2:00 p.m., on .The Dark Side of a Bright Idea: Could Personal
and National Security Risks Compromise the Potential of P2P File-Sharing
Networks?. has been rescheduled for Tuesday, June 17, 2003 at 2:00 p.m.
in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Building.

By order of the Chairman

I wonder if anyone is going to mention that Microsoft Network Neighborhood
file sharing is a form of P2P file sharing.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]