Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv6
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:47:07 -0700 (PDT)




Well, since adding a simple option to IPv4 header would solve all address
space problems w/o any need to change core routing infrastructure (unlike
introduding v6) - I see little need to go for an entirely new L3 protocol.

--vadim

On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:

      1) Is IPV4 approaching an addressing limitation?
      2) Does IPV6 provide a significant buffer of new addresses (given current
allocation policies) the way
      IPV4 did when it was new?

If (1 & 2) => IPV6 is good
If (1 | 2) => undefined
If !(1 & 2) => who cares?


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]