Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Mobile code security (was Re: rr style scanning of non-customers)
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:43:41 +0100 (BST)

the thing that actually burns my hash, is when my spam
complaints or noc correspondance are robotically bounced because they
contain dangerous mime attachments of type "message/rfc822" (spam
examples) or "text/plain" (traceroute or tcpdump output). if your noc
or abusedesk has such a robot protecting it, you ought to be ashamed.

Or they may be happy thinking their NOC is more 0day virus proof rather
than hoping a 3rd party will update their scanner in time

Who'd want to risk the NOC falling to the same problem that's just
taken out the network they're trying to fix?


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]