Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: ISPs are asked to block yet another port
From: "Peter E. Fry" <pfry () swbell net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:44:05 -0500


Sean Donelan wrote:

http://www.lurhq.com/popup_spam.html

"LURHQ Corporation has observed traffic to large blocks of IP addresses on
udp port 1026. [...]

  I haven't (yet) seen any scans of port 1026, but looking at my (home)
logs I have seen several with a fixed source port of 1026 (destination
of 137).  Heh.

Peter E. Fry


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]