Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:56:51 +0000 (GMT)

Funny that shim6 is being mentioned.  The corresponding open mic session 
at 35 showed how gathering people for 20 minutes of complaining can 
effectively replace long, protracted email threads.

There was even unicast chatter about trying to coordinate NOGs with 

Per, I'd like to take exception with your "exclude small companies" 
remark.  This thread is about tighter engineering and ops involvement, 
so why shoot down those who have the two tightly coupled?  Why eschew 
people who work both sides of the fence?

Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]