Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: David Meyer <dmm () 1-4-5 net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:39:20 -0800

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:26:47AM -0600, Randy Bush wrote:

Funny that shim6 is being mentioned.  The corresponding open mic session 
at 35 showed how gathering people for 20 minutes of complaining can 
effectively replace long, protracted email threads.

and what was the effect in the ietf?  zippo.

        Agreed. And to be honest, I missed this in my notes from
        35 (and the two sets of minutes that we had). While I
        can't say authoratively, but I'm willing to wager that
        the {MPLS, IPv6, <X>} WG didn't consider this as a
        proposal. To that end, I'm happy to help write it up with
        whomever wants to for Dallas (or whenever works).

        More generally folks, let's solve this problem.


Attachment: _bin

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]