Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:32:07 +0000 (GMT)

PH> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:14:03 +0100
PH> From: Per Heldal

PH> ...quite the opposite of what I ment to say. Most nanog'ers work in
PH> engineering. The problem is a lack of ops-people turning these
PH> xOG-groups ito xEG-groups instead.

Ah.  That makes much more sense. :-)

PH> PS! I prefer tight integration of operations and engineering. I'd say
PH> it's good for engineering-staff to do ops-work from time to time (eat
PH> their own dog food;). Organisations that practise job-rotation generally
PH> have the better solutions.

Indeed, or at least so I like to think.  Tight integration means fewer 
kludges that simply translate to more work for someone else.

e.g., I'm currently working on a project that requires a new protocol.  
I'm also the one who must write the code, test, and [initially] keep it 
up and running once complete.  No shifting the burden "10% easier here, 
30% tougher there" going on around here. ;-)

Perhaps what more organizations need is management who can properly 
bridge the different camps.

Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]