mailing list archives
Re: ignore the word "radical"
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:35:39 +0000 (GMT)
JAK> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:02:14 -0800 (PST)
JAK> From: John A. Kilpatrick
JAK> As long as you can find a customer who wants to be dual-homed and doesn't
JAK> care about PI then great. But most folks who bother to be dual-homed
My primary focus has been on the SOHO users who rarely have more than a
/29, and frequently have a dynamically-assigned /32. Clearly, anyone
who doesn't mind their IP changing weekly is not concerned about PI
space. Portable space requires more prefixes or some sort of source
JAK> want/need PI space and don't want to renumber when changing
JAK> providers. I know that was a consideration when I dual-homed.
Are you saying that people who cannot obtain PI space would rather
remain single-homed? That they'll forgo multihoming until they can
justify PI space?
There have been claims that it's time to upgrade to hardware that can
route /32s. If that is so, all this attempt to aggregate is moot, and
it's time for people to drop prefix-length filters. I'm skeptical.
I'm also curious: Who's first to put their money where their mouth is,
prove that Moore's Law will save them, route /32s, and also remove their
prefix count limits?
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.