mailing list archives
Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend?
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:07:59 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Todd Vierling wrote:
I might be crazy, but couldn't you just prepend the route enough to
effectively poison it at ingress to 'backup-isp' ?
Some route decision override schemes don't care what the path length is at
all, or factor it in with such a low weight, such that no reasonable amount
of prepending will change the situation.
And while I actually misunderstood what you said, this is still partly
correct -- ISP_B will often put a preference onto their own route at a level
that outweighs path length absolutely.
If ISP_B has a "don't prefer" community, that could work for ISP_B's own
customers, but short of removing the advertisement from ISP_B's peers too,
that doesn't always move traffic completely off of the ISP_B pipe. This is
because traffic entering ISP_B destined for the network *will* usually
prefer ISP_B's link in spite of the community, thanks to ISP_B not desiring
to transit packets in and out of their network without a revenue point
somewhere in the path.
With the development of source traffic engineering schemes, prepending is no
longer reliable as a means of affecting routing on the remote side. That
perception will have to die with it (hopefully sooner rather than later).
-- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com> <todd () vierling name>