Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
From: Daniel Golding <dgolding () burtongroup com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:37:34 -0500


On 2/28/06 5:21 PM, "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch () muada com> wrote:


On 28-feb-2006, at 23:15, John Payne wrote:

Should be doable with a DNS SRV record like mechanism. Don't worry
too much about this one.

Where does the assumption that the network operators control the
DNS for the end hosts come from?

...or in another way. Don't worry too much about this one.

Unacceptable. This is the whole problem with shim6 - the IETF telling us to
"sit back and enjoy it, because your vendors know what's best". This
attitude combined with Shim6's (many) limitations speed it toward
irrelevance.

-- 
Daniel Golding



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]