Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat?
From: sgorman1 () gmu edu
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:28:54 -0500

Agree that a level of security is required, but the real value is in customers like banks knowing where their fiber is, 
so when they lease service for a back up provider they know it is not in the same ditch.

The article attribute the pro regulation quote to me, but actually it was out of context.  I was proposing that you 
need an anonymous secure data pool that cusomers could qery to see what providers for a set of buildings are diverse. 
The mathematics to do the diversity optimization are available just an issue of data. 

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () wvi com>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:42 pm
Subject: Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat?

Jerry Pasker wrote:

While it is always fun to call the government stupid, or anyone 
for that matter, there is a little more to the story.

- For one you do not need a backhoe to cut fiber
- Two, fiber carries a lot more than Internet traffic - cell 
911, financial tranactions, etc. etc.
- Three, while it is very unlikely terrorists would only attack 
telecom infrastructure, a case can be made for a telecom attack 
amplifies a primary conventional attack.  The loss of 
would complicate things quite a bit.

I'll agree it is very far fethced you could hatch an attack 
plan from 
FCC outage reports, but I would not call worrying about attacks 
telecommunications infrastructure stupid.  Enough sobriety 
please return to the flaming.

I agree with you on all points except the one you didn't make.  

The point is:  What's more damaging?  Being open with the maps 
EVERYONE can see where the problem areas are so they can design 
them? (or chose not to) or pulling the maps, and reports, and 
our heads in the sand, and hoping that security through 
obscurity works.

The people who have the problem areas should already know about 
them and 
 be designing around them. I'm sure that Sprint, for example, 
very well where backhoes have gone through it's fiber. Although it 
sounds like they may not know where all their fiber is... <sigh>

Joe Schmuck down on 2nd Street doesn't need to know about the 
areas and his input would likely be unwelcome.

And no security or amount of redundancy is likely to be perfect - 
these companies are in business to make money after all.

Obscurity is not the entire answer. But it should be part of it.

Jeff Shultz

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]