Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: is this like a peering war somehow?
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:45:18 +0000 (GMT)

DG> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:49:12 -0500
DG> From: Daniel Golding

DG> The RBOCs need to get over this - they are floundering around to try and
DG> find a way to recoup network costs. This is one front. IMS is another. I

It's not just RBOCs.  Approximately five years back I approached a 
cableco about peering.  They wanted to charge more for peering than what 
they did for transit.  Justification?  "It's priority access to our 

Note that it was NOT due to transit costs.  They still wanted the higher 
fee if one ran a private line directly to their POP.

This was for a mostly-content network.  So much for content/eyeball 

Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]