Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:54:49 -0500


On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:

seems to me that certified validation of prefix ownership and as
path are the only real way out of these problems that does not
teach us the 42 reasons we use a *dynamic* protocol.

Wouldn't a well-operated network of IRRs used by 95% of
network operators be able to meet all three of your
requirements?

Maybe I missed something, but didn't Verio say the prefix was in their internal registry, and that's why it was accepted.

IOW: It didn't solve this problem. So I guess we're discussing the other 5%?

--
TTFN,
patrick


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]