Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Destructive computer viruses from history
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () world std com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:03:07 -0500 (EST)




On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
"Even so, 300,000 infected users worldwide is not a terribly large
amount when compared to previous worms like Sober or Mydoom. However,
with this worm it isn't the quantity of infected users, it is the
destructive payload which is most concerning."

Vmyths used to be a great source for debunking a lot of the virus
hype. Everything old seems to be new again.  In 1999, the Chernobyl
virus was the end of the world.  It erased disks and BIOS of computers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/329688.stm

Fast forward 2005. What is the proper response for a global
impact of ~200K machines that may suffer data loss? I
don't think that inter-continental mobilization is the
answer. 

Wall Street may agree as well. AV and security
companies gained nothing from this outbreak other than incurred
operational expense - a data point to add to the "is the customer
paying their fair share" argument.

-M<


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]