Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: [OCCAID] 6bone addresses going away in June
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:41:33 -0500

On 6-Jan-2006, at 11:23, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

guess terado services will get a facelift then too? (since they
require/use the 3ffe range for comms)

The most recent draft for teredo only requires use of 3FFE::/16 obliquely:

2.6 Global Teredo IPv6 service prefix

   An IPv6 addressing prefix whose value is XXXX:XXXX:/32.
   (TBD IANA; experiments use the value 3FFE:831F::/32, taken from a
   range of experimental IPv6 prefixes assigned to Microsoft.)

Draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-05 expired last October, and I can't find it in the I-D tracker. It doesn't seem like it would be too much of a stretch to update that section if a revision was in the works.

In real life, does anybody actually use terado? Are there a well- known set of teredo servers and relays for which some arbitrary, large ISP might measure traffic levels? It seems like if it was enabled it would be possible to measure traffic from teredo's bubbles, even if nobody was actually using it to retrieve content.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]