mailing list archives
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network
From: kris foster <kris.foster () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:43:08 -0800
On Jan 4, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 5, 2009, at 1:33 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
I can think of several instances where it _must_ be external. For
instance, as I said before, knowing which intermediate networks are
incapable of handling the additional load is useful information.
On Jan 5, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
But before any testing is done on production systems (during
maintenance windows scheduled for this type of testing,
naturally), it should all be done on airgapped labs, first, IMHO.
Without arguing that point (and there are lots of scenarios where
that is not at all necessary, IMHO), it does not change the fact
that external testing can be extremely useful after "air-gap"
Fine test it by simulation on you or the transit end of the pipes.
Do not transmit your test sh?t data across the `net.
How do you propose a model is built for the simulation if you can't
collect data from the real world?
This is not "sh?t data". Performance testing across networks is very
real and happening now. The more knowledge I have of a path the better
decisions I can make about that path.
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network Edward B. DREGER (Jan 07)
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network deleskie (Jan 05)
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network Roland Dobbins (Jan 05)
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 05)
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network Edward B. DREGER (Jan 05)
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 05)
RE: Ethical DDoS drone network Michael Gazzerro (Jan 05)
RE: Ethical DDoS drone network Ray Corbin (Jan 05)