mailing list archives
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:14:41 +0000 (GMT)
JL> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:54:24 -0500
JL> From: Jeffrey Lyon
JL> FWIW, I'm primarily concerned about testing PPS loads and not brute
JL> force bandwidth.
Which underscores my point: <x> bps with minimally-sized packets is even
higher pps than <x> bps with "normal"-sized packets, for any non-minimal
value of "normal". Thus, the potential for breaking something that
scales based on pps instead of bps _increases_ under such testing.
I've not [yet] seen an AUP that reads "customer shall maintain a minimum
packet size of 400 bytes (combined IP header and payload) averaged over
a moving one-hour window". ;-)
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
Re: Ethical DDoS drone network deleskie (Jan 05)
- Re: Ethical DDoS drone network, (continued)
- Re: Ethical DDoS drone network Edward B. DREGER (Jan 05)
- RE: Ethical DDoS drone network michael.dillon (Jan 05)