mailing list archives
RE: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () verneglobal com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:38:30 +0000
It depends on where in some cases. Take Greenland for example. Prior to Tele Greenland possibly completing the
Greenland Connect cable real soon now (Halifax to Nuuk, Nuuk to Iceland, branched to Qaqortoq, with xcon to UK and
Denmark) I seem to recall that a large amount of their capacity was via satellite from Godthab(Nuuk) to Denmark.
In this case, you're likely talking 100%. Almost all of your remote cases are going to be in a similiar situation ie.
Svarlsbad, most stuff above t~N60^ parallel (or so) etc.
 Tele Greenland IT News Item (see last paragraph, Brian Buus Pedersen is Tele's CEO)
Martin Hannigan http://www.verneglobal.com/
Senior Director e: hannigan () verneglobal com
Verne Global Datacenters c: +16178216079
Keflavik, Iceland f: +16172347098
From: Kevin.Smith () dca state fl us [Kevin.Smith () dca state fl us]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 15:34
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic
Participting in a severe solar event EXERCISE. Can anyone give me an
educated guesstimate of the percentage of backbone traffic that is
satellite dependent vs. that which is totally land-based?
Information Systems & Services
Department of Community Affairs
kevin.smith () dca state fl us [preferred]
Sent from a BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Florida has a broad public records law and all correspondence, including
email addresses, may be subject to disclosure.
Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Sean Donelan (Jan 06)
Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic JF Mezei (Jan 07)
RE: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Martin Hannigan (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic, (continued)