Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0]
From: "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:59:23 -0600

On 1/12/09, Jim Shankland <nanog () shankland org> wrote:

Adam Young wrote:

I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for.
 Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok.
I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though.

That has not been my experience.  Peering wars have been an issue, but
aside from that, they've been fine.  (This is transit in San Francisco
at the gigabit-plus level.)

Jim Shankland

Seconded. We also have Cogent for gigabit transit. I had far more problems
in the short time we used Level3 for transit than I've had with Cogent.


Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbraith () gmail com

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]