Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:45:32 -0500

On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Soucy, Ray wrote:

We peer with Cogent.  They are very competitive in terms of pricing.
To be honest, Cogent has been pretty good to us. As long as you have a
2nd peer (which it sounds like you do) for backup I'd say they're a
pretty safe bet.

I think you mean s/peer/transit.

--
TTFN,
patrick


The only problem I've had with Cogent is that they're still not ready to
route IPv6.

The whole "you get what you pay for" talk is nonsense in my book, you're paying top dollar with places like Sprint because they use the income to
subsidize their other efforts that are taking a loss.

Ray Soucy
Communications Specialist

+1 (207) 561-3526

Communications and Network Services

University of Maine System
http://www.maine.edu/


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Bartz [mailto:mob () bartzfamily net]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:54 PM
To: neal rauhauser
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0

I like the haiku!  On a serious note, we are considering getting a
connection from Cogent.  We currently have connections to at&t, Level
3 and TW Telecom.  The low cost and high number of peer AS number's
seems appealing to us.  Every carrier has its issues, so I don't know
what to make of the apparent negativity that I am seeing in these
haiku threads.  I am looking for some first hand experiences to help
me make this decision.

Thanks for any assistance!

Mike


On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:59 PM, neal rauhauser <nrauhauser () gmail com>
wrote:
Cogent makes a mess
My phone rings and rings
Unfornicate this!




--
Mike Bartz
mob () bartzfamily net





  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]