Home page logo

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why no SIDR for
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:00:11 +0100

bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
    there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for 
    a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published,
    and then the prefix was not properly reclaimed...   and so was
    reused for something else.
Interresting that you say that. Still using 3ffe::/24 and ip6.int I
guess? :) You clearly thought you needed to keep your 'customers'
connected on the 6bone using that block of space.

      you guess wrong.

Not a guess, it is what you wrote, long live archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/nanog () nanog org/msg00270.html has:
bmanning wrote:
        Sure...  there are only a few left.  Got rid of two a couple
        weeks back.  That said....

        I will announce the prefix as long as people are using it.
        (whine away)

Other references you probably still have unread in your mailbox.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]