Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Are you getting Spam from Crossfire Media?
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:44:14 -0500

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:33:48AM +1300, Mark Foster wrote:
I do have to ask though, what's up with third-party systems creating a web
accessible archive of the mailing list?  Worse, with them not fudging
email addresses when doing so?

1. (in reply to the original) I haven't received anything from them here
yet, but it may have been rejected at the perimeter.  When I get a chance
this evening, I'll check logs and see if I turn up anything.

2. Yes, it's quite rude for third parties to set up (public) archives
of mailing lists without the prior, express consent of the owner(s)
of those lists.  I don't see a problem with individual members of
such lists maintaining their own (private) archives -- and I routinely
do so for every list I'm on.

3. But it's utterly pointless to obfuscate addresses in such archives:
spammers have long since set up quite efficient methods of harvesting
any address used on any public mailng list or Usenet newsgroup. [1]  The
only people meaningfully impeded by these futile attempts at obfuscation
are legitimate senders.

---Rsk

[1] Someone should explain this to Google in re their Usenet archive:
spammers have NNTP feeds, too.


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]