mailing list archives
Re: Approach to allocating netblocks
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:50:21 -0700
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:05, Frank Bulk <frnkblk () iname com> wrote:
For the first time we have our own ARIN-assigned netblocks that we can now
split out and divide to our customers.
What's the best approach to handing out /30's, /29's, etc. that is efficient
as possible but allows for customers to expand their allocation to a
We pay much more attn to efficient utilization and advertisement
aggregation than to ensuring that customers have contiguous blocks.
For example, we internally assign a /24 to a given PE router and then
assign from it straight through; 0/30, 4/30, 8/29, etc. as customers
get turned up or request more space. Then when it's used up, we add
another... Although it is neat and tidy to have contiguous blocks
everywhere, the cost to benefit doesn't seem to be there so we focus
on aggregation at transition points such as edge to backbone, backbone
to peers, etc.
I was thinking of having one /24 for each block size, and then do the divide
and conquer approach by allocating the first /30, for example, as 0 and 128,
then next two at 64 and 192, etc. Once there's only one /30 free between
each allocation, I would start using another /24. Of course, that would
mean 50% (or less) utilization.
Re: Approach to allocating netblocks Chris Grundemann (Jan 14)
Re: Approach to allocating netblocks William Herrin (Jan 15)