Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:44:21 -0500

On Jan 15, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 14 Jan 2009, at 16:06, Jeroen Massar wrote:

Simon Lockhart wrote:
(Yes, I'm in the minority that thinks that Randy hasn't done anything bad)
Nah, I agree with Randy's experiment too. People should protect their networks better and this is clearly showing that there are a lot of vulnerable places in the core internet structure.

The end sometimes justifies the means, and someone in the research community discovering flaws in bgp implementation (software, protocol, or process - at the bgp stack, in my NOC tools, in the community's understanding) before hackers/spammers/fraudsters do, then I count that as a result.

We disagree.

The 'researcher' does not get to decide whether the information gained by yelling fire to see how quickly people react is worth the risk of someone getting hurt, or even just missing the rest of the movie.

No reputable research institution's ethics committee would allow an "experiment" to proceed which announced a prefix in such a way that every network engineer on the planet would assume the prefix traveled through $ASN even though the prefix had not, and the researcher did not even notify $ASN of the experiment.

--
TTFN,
patrick



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]