mailing list archives
Re: Approach to allocating netblocks
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:32:34 +0100
--On torsdag, torsdag 15 jan 2009 15.11.48 -0500 William Herrin
<herrin-nanog () dirtside com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Måns Nilsson
<mansaxel () besserwisser org> wrote:
from operational standpoint renumbering is not that bad.
xt provides 24 pages and growing worth of problems with renumbering.
Here's a simple one:
Web browsers intentionally violate the DNS TTL with a technique called
Given the small netmasks, I'd guess that most of the browser population
behind them is addicted to a proxy. The proxy might not subscribe to
Also, the browsers that run for months typically aren't on end-user PCs,
but on the workstations of the clued, if I might be so blunt.
It is not that renumbering is painless, not at all. But it is very useful
as "spring cleaning". I'd rather know what happens by testing it than
finding out by being woken up while on call.
Måns Nilsson M A C H I N A
Now KEN and BARBIE are PERMANENTLY ADDICTED to MIND-ALTERING DRUGS ...
Re: Approach to allocating netblocks Chris Grundemann (Jan 14)
Re: Approach to allocating netblocks William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: Approach to allocating netblocks Måns Nilsson (Jan 15)